In the last week or so, two bundle boats from Oman came to
my attention. First, a reader sent me a link to this travel
article in Daily Kos, containing this photo:
This brought to mind the following photo of a shasha,
another Omani bundle boat, from Tim Severin’s The Sinbad Voyage, which I reproduced in a post several years ago.
But unlike the boat in the Daily Kos photo, this one was made from palm fronds.
A shasha -- an Omani bundle boat made of palm fronds (Source: The Sinbad Voyage) |
The very next day, an image of another Omani bundle boat, also
apparently made of palm fronds, appeared in my Facebook feed. I found it
surprising that, even in the present day and within the confines of a rather
small country, two methods of bundle boat construction, based on different
materials, remain in use.
Original caption: "These are fishing boats in Oman. They are filled with polystyrene and paddled out to sea. At night the catch is landed and the village builds bonfires to cook supper. Which is fish." (Posted by Jonathan Savill to the Facebook page Church of the Double-Bladed Paddle) |
Bundle boats are not really boats: they are boat-shaped
rafts that derive their buoyancy from the materials of their construction, which are themselves buoyant. In contrast, true boats achieve buoyancy enclosing air
within a watertight shell (or, to phrase it another way, by excluding water
from a watertight shell).
In most cases, bundle boats are made from soft, flexible materials like
grass, rushes, reeds, or leaves, large amounts of which are wrapped with
cordage into long bundles – generally pointed at both ends – and then tied to
other bundles into a boat shape – i.e., pointed at the bow (and often, at the
stern), and usually with something approximating either raised gunwales, also
composed of bundles, or a cockpit formed by leaving a cavity in or between bundles.
Sticks, roots or branches may also be used for construction. In most cases, these
are tied into bundles in a manner similar to that used for soft, flexible
materials, but in others, they are arranged and lashed side-by-side and not truly bundled.
This method reduces the craft’s buoyancy and freeboard, also reducing its
payload and leaving the boatman’s bottom constantly wet, but it also reduces
its weight and makes it easier to dry, probably prolonging its life.
Absent gunwales or a cockpit, a bundle-built craft would have no
“inside,” and lacking this characteristic, it would be a stretch to to call it boat-like.
But that’s hardly a firm definition. Some models of papyrus bundle craft from
ancient Egypt lack “insides” but are so boat-like in shape that it is hard to
deny them the name bundle boat. (The models do have very low bundle-built toe-rails,
however, which approximate the function of gunwales in a minimal way.)
Ancient Egyptian papyrus-bundle canoes pulling a trawl between them. (Source: Hornell) |
Somewhat similar reed “boats” remain in use on Lake Titicaca,
although they have substantial bundle gunwales, and thus a definite “inside.” What
most distinguishes these craft from Egypt and Lake Titicaca from the Omani, Upper
Nile and Lobito Bay types shown above, however, is the large volume of the bundles in
comparison to the load, placing the boatman and his cargo well above the water and
giving fair promise of keeping him and his cargo dry.
A fishing balsa made of totora reeds, on Lake Titicaca (Source: Hornell) |
The bundle boat was an technological dead end in the sense that it apparently
never evolved anywhere into a true boat. Although stick-built bundle
boats appear superficially to be a step in that direction,
they are still solidly rafts in concept.
But technological evolution is not the sole measure of past
or present validity. The fact that bundle boats remain in use in more than one
culture in the 21st century testifies to their practicality and the soundness of
the concept.
Sources:
Basil Greenhill, Archaeology of the Boat
Paul Johnstone (Ed., Sean McGrail), The Sea-Craft of Prehistory
James Hornell, Water Transport: Origins and Early Evolution
(and as noted in text)
Had not heard of this particular type. Anyway, if the boat is still used and useful, it is "modern" in the anthropological sense of the word!
ReplyDelete