The large vessel is a yathra dhoni. Its outrigger allows it to sit upright on the beach without temporary supports (from Devendra, "The Lost Ships of Lanka.") (Click any image to enlarge) |
Seagoing ships with outriggers are a rarity. If one defines “ships” as
“(floating mobile nautical) structures which constituted significant elements
in the economies of the societies which built and operated them” (Basil
Greenhill, in The Earliest Ships: The
Evolution of Boats into Ships), then a few of the larger traditional single-outrigger
canoes of Oceania would qualify, but based on their size, burthen, and the fact
that they are “canoes,” most modern observers would still call them “boats”
without hesitation. Some motorized bancas of the Philippines might be (just)
large enough to be thought ship-like by some, but no one of these
double-outrigger vessels would qualify on the grounds of economic significance.
The yathra dhoni of Sri Lanka and the Coromandel Coast on India, then, may
be the only traditional outrigger vessel that was undeniably a “ship.” Large and
burthensome enough so as not to be mistaken for a boat, and used as a cargo
carrier on both coastal and short oceanic voyages, the single-outrigger yathra
dhoni (also spelled yatra dhoni, and also known as the maha-oruwa or maha oru,
meaning “big outrigger canoe”) was in use for centuries – possibly thousands of
years – and remained in common use into the early twentieth century.
Outrigger ships in Sri Lanka were noted by Strabo (65 BCE-19 CE) and
Pliny (23-79 CE), and if these were not yathra dhonies per se, they were probably their direct ancestors. A temple carving
in Borobudur, Java, dated to the 8th to 10th century CE,
shows “the arrival of Aryan emigrants to the Indonesian Islands” (Vitharana) in
an outrigger vessel with features similar to the yathra. (The original Aryans,
however, were from the area that is now northern India, not Coromandel or Sri
Lanka.) Near the end of their history, yathras were known to be trading as far
as the Moluccas, so their earlier use transporting Aryans or their neighbors to
Java (which, like the Moluccas, is in Indonesia, but closer to India) seems
credible.
Most yathras were 50 to 60 feet LOA with a main hull beam of 12 to 15
feet. The largest were 100 feet long with a 20 foot hull beam. Vitharana states
that they were 10 to 15 feet in height, although it is unclear what points of
measurement are implied. Cargoes ranged from 25 to 75 tonnes, with 50 being
typical. The main hull was double-ended, with slack bilges, full midsections,
and a slightly hollow entry.
Tom Vosmer's profile drawing of the Dodanduva yathra dhoni model (from Devendra, "The Lost Ships of Lanka) |
The outrigger varied in length, from about a third (Paris) to well over
two-thirds (Vosmer’s drawing of a highly detailed model built in the former
yathra center of Dodanduva, Sri Lanka, that is widely accepted for its
authority) the length of the main hull. It was always mounted on the port side,
fastened directly to substantial, downward-curving booms that extended right
through the main hull at the level of the deck beams. (One simplified model
exists with the outrigger to starboard, but this model lacks a rudder and may
represent a different vessel type, or the difference may be due to imprecision
on the modeler’s part.) Guys leading diagonally from the main hull to the outer
ends of the outrigger booms helped stabilize the outrigger float fore-and-aft.
The Dodanduva model of a yathra dhoni (from Green) |
The yathra’s rudder followed the curve of the sternpost. The rudder on
the Dodanduva model is enormous and wide, but other reliable sources show
rudders of more graceful shape and conventional proportions. From this, it
appears that rudders were fitted in a range of sizes and styles. Vitharana
refers to a “secondary rudder to act as a leeboard … in the region of the main
mast touching the water on the starboard side,” but in no models or drawings
that I know of does such a feature appear. A leeboard would appear to be
unnecessary, since the hull was built on a keel that provided significant
lateral plane to resist leeway. Some models and drawings also show a “gripe” at
the bow and a skeg at the stern (upon which the rudder’s lower end was hung),
both of which added to the lateral plane and directional stability.
Hornell's sketch of a yathra dhoni |
The common rig was a ketch with square headed, loose-footed cloth lugsails
and a jib on a bowsprit, said by Green to be “a rig common to the region of the
Indian subcontinent.” Some smaller yathras may have had a single mast. Hornell’s
sketch of the ketch version shows a second headsail inside the first one,
apparently set flying, with its tack led to the port bulwark or possibly to the
foredeck. Admiral Paris’s drawing shows a whisker pole holding out the luff of
the mainsail. Standing rigging included shrouds, fore- and backstays, and a
stay between the mastheads. According to Green, “The arrangement of the
halyards was such that they prevent the mizzen yard from passing around the
forward side of the mast. It must therefore be concluded that the mizzen sail
on the yatra was never tacked, but
went aback against the mast when occasionally on a starboard tack.”
Two bulkheads divided the hull into three sections: small bow and stern
compartments, the use of which I have not found described, and a large cargo
hold between them. Much of the deck was covered by a light, removable deckhouse
roofed with split bamboo, leaving only narrow walkways along the sides for the
crew to move fore and aft. Sliding cargo hatches were offset to starboard, and
a simple cargo handling crane was located to port. In order for this to come in
use, lighters – probably small dugout canoes – must have come alongside the
main hull between the outrigger booms. But because the vessel would sit upright
on a beach, supported by the outrigger, it may be that loading and unloading was
often done on land. One assumes that the deckhouse roof was removed before
cargo was handled.
The hull of the yathra was of a carvel construction using an unusual
combination of stitched and nailed fastening. The planks, a minimum of 2”
thick, were stitched to each other with coir rope and nailed to the frames with
iron nails and roves. Accounts differ on whether the stitching holes penetrated straight through to the inner surface of the planks or exited on the plank edges. In any case, it is clear that the stitching served only to hold the planks against each other and not to the frames. Details on the order of
construction are lacking, but one presumes that the planks were stitched first
to make them tight, and nailed second. Joints were caulked with coconut husks
and leaves inserted before the stitches were drawn tight.
Vosmer's construction drawings of the Dodanduva yathra dhoni model (from Devendra, "Pre-Modern Sri Lankan Ships") |
Stem and sternpost were fastened to the keel with hooked scarfs held
with locking wedges. The frames and deck beams were few in number and widely
spaced but of heavy scantlings, providing sufficient overall strength. Deck beams extended through the planking on both sides. Green
says the frames were continuous from sheer to sheer, but given their scantlings
and the hull’s shape, this seems impossible. Perhaps his information, which is
not footnoted, stems from observation of a model which used continuous frames
for expediency.
Tom Vosmer took careful measurements of the Dodanduva model, fed the
details into a hydrostatics program, and found that the main hull, even without
the outrigger, was “reasonably stable.” The outrigger, of course, significantly
increased the vessel’s righting moment (by a factor of 100). It also increased drag,
and therefore, the ship’s powering requirements. The rig, therefore, could have
been smaller and simpler if the (still seaworthy) hull did not have an
outrigger attached.
Yathra dhoni at anchor in Kalpitiya, Sri Lanka, 1913 (from Devendra, "The Lost Ships of Lanka") |
Yathras were mainly short- and medium-haul cargo vessels, serving ports
large and small throughout Sri Lanka and the Coromandel Coast and making regular
voyages to the Maldives (550 miles from Colombo, Sri Lanka), although they also
sailed at least occasionally to the Moluccas (3,600 miles). Typical cargoes
included textiles, rice, salt, fish and fish products, tea, and tiles. A large
one carried a crew of 18.
The outrigger was always kept to windward except, perhaps, in the most
benign conditions – an unusual and highly limiting practice for a tacking single-outrigger
vessel. Working within these limits required coastal voyages to make use of the daily reversal of land
and sea breezes: the vessel sailed only during the part of day when the
prevailing breeze allowed the outrigger to be kept to windward. On longer
voyages, the monsoon breeze dictated direction. This would have meant just a
single round trip from Sri Lanka to the Maldives in any given year, whereas a vessel
that could sail with either side to windward would be able to make several round
trip voyages of that distance each year.
Most accounts tell of the yathra succumbing to competition from steamships
around the turn of the twentieth century. Vitharana claims that 40 of them were
still serving Dodanduva in the 1930s, but all other accounts tell of the last
one being built there to some fanfare in 1930; that is was wrecked on its first
voyage in the Maldives; and that that was the end of the tradition.
Sources:
Somasiri Devendra, "Pre-Modern Sri Lankan Ships" in Ships and the Development of Maritime Technology in the Indian Ocean, David Parkin gand Ruth Barnes, editors. Routledge, 2002
Devendra, "The Lost Ships of Lanka," from Maritime Heritage of Lanka: Ancient ports and harbours. National Heritage Trust Sri Lanka, 2013
Devendra, "The Mansion of the Sea," The Island Online - Saturday Magazine
Jeremy Green, "The archaeological contribute to the knowledge of the extra-European shipbuilding at the time of the Medieval and Modern Iberian-Atlantic tradition" Proceedings: International Symposium on Archaeology of Medieval and Modern Ships of Iberian-Atlantic Tradition
Jeremy Green, "The archaeological contribute to the knowledge of the extra-European shipbuilding at the time of the Medieval and Modern Iberian-Atlantic tradition" Proceedings: International Symposium on Archaeology of Medieval and Modern Ships of Iberian-Atlantic Tradition
James Hornell, Water Transport: Origins and Early Evolution, Cambridge University Press, 1946
The National Trust of Sri Lanka, "The Annapoorani and The Amugoda Oruwa: The Forgotten Ships of Lanka" on Facebook
Corioli Souter, "Travellers and Traders in the Indian Ocean World Curatorial Audio Guide," WAM Audio Tours, Western Austrian Museum
Fascinating that the ama was always to WW for the tacking boat -- an excellent reminder of how regional designs can be so wholly specialized to economic patterns and environment. It would be interesting to know if the limited trading schedule due to this sailing mode was at some optimum balance (and little understood by someone with a purely capitalist drive for more and more profit) with occupational patterns tied to non-maritime activities (farming and fishing for example) and sustainable resource use.
ReplyDeleteReally interesting thought, Wade. I was thinking of it only in terms of its limitations, not that there might be a solid justification for it. Thanks for the wakeup.
ReplyDelete