Songhai stitched boat. Bow is to the left. (Click any image to enlarge.) |
A Songhai boat being built or repaired. |
The boats were used for fishing and general transport, but around the city of Gao their primary use was the transportation of rice from the paddies to the villages for threshing. Propulsion was by both paddle and pole, depending upon the river's depth.
Stitching detail, with grass caulking captured between the stitches. |
West of Lake Debo and south of Ansongo, a different kind of sewn boat was used. Called the Kole-Kole, this boat was two half-dugouts, sewn together along a central seam. This boat was preferred in its indigenous regions due to the presence of suitable trees for this type of construction.
All information and images are from "A note on a sewn canoe in use at Gao, the Republic of Mali," by Timothy Insoll, in The International Journal of Nautical Archaeology (1993) 22.4: 345-350. This information is now two decades old, and I do not know if these boats are still in use.
Thanks for posting this. These boats were one of the inspirations for my own thoughts on sewn boats in prehistory. Point is that they were pragmatic craft. The need for a boat was there and the materials to hand were assembled to create them with sewing as with the Chumash of the Americas where short planks had also to be used.
ReplyDeleteSadly planks are so useful that bits of a redundant boat can be re-used and vanish from the archaeological record more easily than perhaps a logboat can.
I have wondered whether the large sewn boats such as the Ferribys and the Dover Bronze Age boat were attempts to repeat the method and design of "canoes" in much larger vessels with limited success.
There is always a temptation with ships to build bigger because of the economies of scale in transportation with sometimes catastrophic results until new technologies are developed.
Edwin,
ReplyDeleteThanks for your comments, especially for noting the similarity in construction method to the Chumash boats.
I think it's indisputable that the builders of the Ferriby and Dover boats were still conceptually in the dugout phase, trying to figure out how to build a dugout bigger than the available trees (more so with Dover than Ferriby). They hadn't yet arrived at the notion of bent planks and were still carving boat shapes out of tree trunks.
Such attempts may significantly predate Britain's Bronze Age. There is a clay boat model from Osikovo, Bulgaria, 4th Millenium BC, that is so wide relative to its length that it's thought to represent the same kind of construction as the kole-kole: two dugout halves, each carved from a single trunk, joined along the centerline. (Or it may have been three pieces: a bottom and two sides, or "iles".)
Without finite element analysis, trial and error was the only way to find out how big you could go with a given construction technique. For a long time, the ship/boat owners were the captains, so they risked not only their fortunes and the lives of their crew, but their own lives as well in these efforts. But they were also perhaps the best-situated to assess the success of any modification, provided they made it back to shore.
Very true Bob that the ship's captain was probably at least part owner or maybe acting on behalf of the village. A feel for ancient shipping and trading is very well put in Geoffrey Bibby's "Four Thousand Years Ago".
DeleteFunny how apparent truths can outlast the technical changes that make the given archaological "facts" obsolescent in older books, Leonard Wooley, MortimerWheeler, Vere Gordon Childe and all the rest should still be read for their insights.